A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled
A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any from the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after far they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of past observed.
one hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it's practical to get a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's reached to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has achieved these types of stage. Read more
Life imprisonment is undoubtedly an alternative towards the death penalty. In these cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life driving bars.
maintaining the conviction awarded on the appellant reduce the sentence from the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
three. I have read the acquired counsel with the parties and have long gone through the record of this case with their capable assistance.
82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
be recognized without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is usually a horrifying reality, an extremely low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to the Judgment within time. Read more
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is set up plus the employee is found guilty after owing process of regulation, it is the prerogative of your here employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the varied penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct is not really satisfactory although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a structured and lawful method. Read more
The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..
How much sway case regulation holds may vary by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances from the current case. To discover this concept, consider the following case law definition.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved unless case is tried out(Bail Matters)
Additionally, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and one hundred twenty in the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set through the government.